Constituted separately
The Panel is constituted separately from the Institute’s officers. Determinations are made by panelists alone.
INDEPENDENT BY DESIGN
The Panel is constituted separately from the Institute’s officers. Determinations are made by panelists alone.
The Institute convenes sub-panels, distributes evidence, and records outcomes. It holds no vote in any determination.
Panelists assess documented, verifiable achievement, not reputation, seniority, or personal familiarity.
SAFEGUARDS
These constraints are written into the Bylaws and apply to every review cycle without exception.
Panelists disclose any relationship with an applicant, whether employment, collaboration, supervision, or commercial interest, and recuse themselves from that review.
No sub-panel may be composed such that one employer or organization holds a majority of its seats.
Each application goes to a freshly constituted sub-panel of three to five panelists, so no standing group controls outcomes.
Every determination is recorded with written reasons referencing the published evidence domains, and retained by the Institute.
Panelists serve on the record. The roster is published before a review cycle opens, so applicants know who may review their work before they decide whether to apply.
An unsuccessful applicant may request a single reconsideration, heard by a newly constituted sub-panel.
HOW A REVIEW RUNS
The Institute checks that the application is complete and the fee is paid.
A sub-panel of three to five panelists is assembled, screened for conflicts, and briefed.
Each panelist reviews the evidence against the six domains without seeing colleagues’ scores first.
The sub-panel confers, resolves differences, and reaches a determination on the overall standard.
Written reasons are filed and the applicant is notified by email, typically within 2 to 4 weeks.
SERVE ON THE PANEL
Panel service is honorary and unpaid. It is the most direct way to shape what Fellowship in this field is going to mean.
QUESTIONS
No. The full Panel roster is published before each review cycle opens, but individual sub-panel assignments are confidential. This protects both applicants and panelists, and it is what makes candid assessment possible.
No. Panel service and Fellowship are separate. Serving confers no eligibility, preference, or presumption of approval should you later apply, and a sitting panelist who applies would be reviewed by a sub-panel excluding themselves.
Yes, provided they independently meet the panelist qualification standard. Ambassador status itself confers no advantage in Panel selection.
Assignments arrive in review cycles rather than continuously, and volume is managed through sub-panel rotation. Panelists complete their evaluations within the cycle deadline.
APPLICANTS
Read the six evidence domains, check your record against them, and submit when you are ready.