Skip to content
AIITE home
MembershipFellowshipReview PanelTraining Fellow LoginReviewer LoginAmbassador Login
Fellow LoginReviewer LoginAmbassador Login

Loading…

Fellow Application
OR

Enter your email and we'll send you a secure sign-in link.

U
Applicant

My Training

Fellowship application

  • Profile○
  • Experience○
  • Evidence0/4
  • Sources○
  • Endorsers○
  • Fee○
  • Review○

Begin your Fellowship review

The FAIITE (Fellow of the AIITE) designation is conferred by a Review Panel based on the evidence you submit. Read the 7 evidence categories before you begin. You need to provide evidence for any 4 out of these 7 categories.

Sign in or create a free account to begin your application.

Four stages, from application to conferral

1. Application

Complete the form with your evidence, endorsers, and declarations.

2. Panel review

An independent panel scores your four claimed categories, plus an Overall Fellowship judgment.

3. Decision

The Panel issues a written determination with reasons. You are notified by email.

4. Conferral

On approval, your Fellow certificate and FAIITE designation are issued automatically.

Before you begin

  • Secure two endorsers: one colleague with direct knowledge of your work, and one independent expert outside your current employer
  • Prepare your professional biography and, for each of your four evidence categories, evidence in SOAR form — Situation, Opportunity, Action, Results & Recognition
  • Assessment fee $199, paid when you submit; review begins once payment is confirmed.
Meeting four evidence categories is necessary but not sufficient. The Panel decides whether your record, considered as a whole, demonstrates outstanding, sustained achievement significantly beyond ordinary professional competence.

Your Fellowship Application

1

Application

Complete the three-step form with your evidence, endorsers, and declarations.

2

Panel Review

An independent panel scores your four claimed categories, plus an Overall Fellowship judgment.

3

Decision

The Panel issues a determination with reasons. You are notified by email.

4

Fellowship Conferred

On approval, your Fellow certificate and FAIITE designation are issued automatically.

Complete the application form below.

🎓

Fellowship Conferred

Congratulations. The Review Panel has conferred Fellowship. Your profile, the Panel that determined it, and your documents are below.

Welcome,

AIITE Fellow seal
Fellow —

Membership details

Grade
Fellow
Register ID
—
Conferred
—
Next renewal
—
Add to your LinkedIn profile
📜 Fellowship certificateIssued on conferral 📄 Reference letterDetermination and panel details 💳 Membership cardYour register number and expiry

Professional bio

Application Not Approved

Thank you for applying. The Panel determined that your application did not meet the criteria for Fellowship at this time. You may apply again in a future cycle once additional evidence has been developed — email support@theaiite.org to open a new application, or to ask about the one reconsideration available under the Bylaws.

Application Fee Payment Required

Your Fellowship application has been saved. Complete the assessment fee payment below to formally submit it for Panel review. Payment is verified automatically and this page updates within a few seconds of checkout.

Assessment fee $199
Pay Application Fee

Secure checkout powered by Stripe.

Online payment is not open yet. Your application is saved but will not be assigned to the Panel until payment is completed. Email support@theaiite.org and we will send you a secure payment link directly.

If you need to update any information after paying, contact support@theaiite.org.

Application Received

Your Fellowship application has been submitted. The Panel will review your evidence and endorsers' endorsements. This typically takes 1-2 weeks, depending on the review cycle. You will be notified by email once a decision has been made.

In the meantime, if you need to update any information or have questions, contact support@theaiite.org.

Apply for AIITE Fellow

1About you
2Endorsers
3Review and submit
About you

Your experience

0 / 150 words

Evidence categories: select four categories out of seven

Each of your four categories must be different, and evidence should reflect significant work you did personally, generally within the last five years. Structure it with SOAR — Situation, Opportunity, Action, Results & Recognition. Review the eligibility criteria before you begin.

Select a category above to see what it covers.

0 / 70 words

0 / 70 words

0 / 140 words

0 / 100 words

Select a category above to see what it covers.

0 / 70 words

0 / 70 words

0 / 140 words

0 / 100 words

Select a category above to see what it covers.

0 / 70 words

0 / 70 words

0 / 140 words

0 / 100 words

Select a category above to see what it covers.

0 / 70 words

0 / 70 words

0 / 140 words

0 / 100 words

Supporting Documents

You may upload only 1 document to support your application (PDFs, images, etc.). Max 10MB.

Supporting Web Links

Share relevant links to your work, projects, or any content that supports your application (optional).

Your endorsers

Your endorsers. You need two endorsers serving different roles — a Professional Relationship endorser with direct, first-hand knowledge of your work, and an Independent Expert endorser outside your current employer who can assess the significance of your achievements in the broader field. Neither may be a subordinate, close relative, paid application preparer, or referral-benefit recipient. Upload a signed statement from each endorser below. AIITE may contact either endorser directly to verify their statement.

You'll need one Professional Relationship endorser to verify you're ready for Fellowship and confirm the accuracy of the accomplishments and recognitions you've included in your application, and one Independent Expert endorser outside your current employer.

Endorser guide: what a statement should contain

An endorser statement does not need to be long. One page is usually sufficient. What matters is that it is specific. A statement that restates your résumé carries little weight with the Panel. Each statement should cover all five points below.

  1. Relationship and basis of knowledge. How they know you, in what capacity, and over what period.
  2. Their own credentials. Their role, organization, and why they are qualified to assess work in your field.
  3. Which specific achievements they can verify. Named projects, publications, or outcomes they observed first-hand.
  4. Why the achievement is significant. Its scale, adoption, or influence relative to normal practice in the field.
  5. Independence disclosure. In case of independent endorsement, confirmation that they don't have any financial relationship or conflict of interest that could affect their impartiality in providing the statement.
Endorser 1: Professional Relationship

Someone with direct, first-hand knowledge of your work. They may be at your current or a previous employer.

View an example statement

Fictional example for illustration only. Names, credentials, publications, and adoption examples are illustrative. Write in your own voice and include only facts and sources you can substantiate.

14 March 2026

To the AIITE Review Panel,

I am writing this letter to support Dr. Priya Raghavan's application for AIITE Fellowship. I am Dr. Alan Mercer, Head of Platform Engineering at Northwind Systems, with nineteen years of experience in distributed systems and a doctorate in computer science. My responsibilities include reviewing the architecture, reliability, and operational performance of large-scale data platforms.

I worked directly with Dr. Raghavan from 2019 to 2023 while she led the team responsible for our multi-region data replication layer. We were peers on the architecture review board, and I regularly reviewed her proposals and the results of their implementation. This gave me firsthand knowledge of her technical contribution, leadership, and professional judgment.

I can verify that Dr. Raghavan originated the consensus-reconciliation approach described in her application. Before its implementation, our failover process required manual intervention and averaged forty minutes of degraded service. Following implementation, the comparable recovery interval fell to under ninety seconds without operator involvement. I reviewed the original design and the operational records supporting these results. Although delivery involved a team, the underlying reconciliation approach was her identifiable intellectual contribution.

Her contribution went beyond routine project delivery. She identified a fundamental limitation in the existing reconciliation model, developed its replacement, and led the work through architecture review and implementation. Over the four years we worked together, I observed sustained technical responsibility and sound judgment in decisions affecting a critical production system.

Beyond that project, I can point to two further examples from our time working together. In 2021, she led the migration of our storage layer off a vendor platform that was being deprecated, coordinating five engineering teams across three time zones, resolving the hardest compatibility issues in the replication protocol herself, and completing the migration two months ahead of the vendor's shutdown deadline with no customer-visible downtime. In 2022, she redesigned our capacity-planning process for the replication tier; it was adopted company-wide, cut infrastructure spend on that tier by roughly 30 percent, and improved p99 latency at the same time.

I have reviewed the portions of her Fellowship application describing these projects, her responsibilities, and their operational outcomes. They accurately reflect the work and results I observed. I also verified her stated USENIX ATC 2022 presentation against the published conference program.

In my assessment, these contributions provide substantial support for her readiness for Fellowship, particularly under Innovation and Adoption, Leadership and Responsibility, and Organizational or Industry Impact. My recommendation rests on the significance of her work and her attributable results, rather than her title or length of service.

I recommend Dr. Raghavan for AIITE Fellowship and welcome questions about the matters I have verified.

Dr. Alan Mercer
Head of Platform Engineering, Northwind Systems
a.mercer@example.com

Endorser 2: Independent Expert

A recognized expert outside your current employer who can assess the significance of your achievements in the broader field.

View an example statement

Fictional example for illustration only. Names, credentials, publications, and adoption examples are illustrative. Write in your own voice and include only facts and sources you can substantiate.

20 March 2026

To the AIITE Review Panel,

I am pleased to offer my strong support for Dr. Priya Raghavan's application for AIITE Fellowship. My endorsement is based on an independent technical assessment of her published work, conference presentation, and documented external adoption. I have been particularly impressed by the practical relevance of her contribution to distributed data systems.

I am Professor of Computer Science at Westbridge University, with twenty-two years of research experience in distributed systems and fault-tolerant computing. I served as program chair of the International Conference on Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing in 2021 and received the Society for Dependable Computing's Distinguished Research Award in 2023. My research addresses consensus, replication, and recovery protocols, providing a direct basis for evaluating the contribution discussed here. My university faculty profile lists my appointments, publications, and professional recognition.

I first encountered Dr. Raghavan's consensus-reconciliation approach when I attended her USENIX ATC presentation in 2022, "Consensus Reconciliation for Reliable Multi-Region Recovery," and subsequently examined the accompanying paper. From 2022 through early 2026, I followed the work's application through published technical accounts. We have never worked for the same employer, co-authored research, or participated in a joint commercial venture. My familiarity with her work developed before I was asked to provide this endorsement.

Her paper identifies the reconciliation model as a fundamental constraint on recovery and describes an approach for improving failover behavior. What impressed me was the connection between her analysis of the problem and a method that engineers could implement and evaluate. In my assessment, this is a substantive technical contribution with practical relevance to organizations operating multi-region data systems.

I reviewed two external engineering accounts: Cedarbridge Cloud's "Applying Consensus Reconciliation to Multi-Region Recovery," published in September 2023, and Harborline Technologies' "Reconciliation-Based Failover in Production," published in June 2024. Both identify Dr. Raghavan's work and describe applying the approach to their own systems. I also examined its discussion in the Society for Dependable Computing's "Practice Guide to Multi-Region State Recovery," published in November 2025. These sources provide an identifiable basis for assessing adoption beyond Northwind Systems.

This progression from technical contribution to external implementation is particularly persuasive. The engineering accounts describe how other practitioners adapted her approach to their own operational constraints. Its subsequent discussion in professional guidance further demonstrates its relevance to practice. Together, these sources support my assessment that her work has made a meaningful contribution beyond its original organizational setting.

I consider this record strong support for conferring AIITE Fellowship on Dr. Raghavan, particularly under Innovation and Adoption and Research and Knowledge Advancement. The documented external use also supports consideration under Organizational or Industry Impact. I would be delighted to see AIITE recognize a professional whose work has helped other practitioners address a demanding engineering problem.

I strongly recommend Dr. Raghavan for AIITE Fellowship. I would be pleased to answer questions about my qualifications, provide the source references discussed above, or explain the reasons for my assessment.

Dr. Elena Park
Professor of Computer Science, Westbridge University
e.park@example.com

Fees, declarations & submit

Please review your details before submitting.

Declarations

Follow AIITE on LinkedIn
Assessment fee
Assessment fee: $199. Submitting your application sends you to Stripe to pay it — your evidence and attachments are uploaded first, so nothing depends on the browser after you leave this page.
Not yet paid

Your application is submitted the moment you click this — you'll be sent to Stripe's secure checkout to complete the $199 payment, and the Panel is notified automatically once it clears.

Online payment is not open yet. Email support@theaiite.org and we will send you a secure payment link directly.

AboutStandardsBylawsPrivacyTermsCookie PreferencesLinkedIn

© 2026 AIITE · American Institute for Information Technology & Engineering

We use essential cookies to keep you signed in and remember preferences. With your consent, we also use Google Analytics to understand how the Site is used. Read our cookie policy.